AMRClearinghouse.org
Abandoned Mine Reclamation Clearinghouse … serving Pennsylvania watershed associations
a service of
WPCAMR
welcome &
introduction
land
reclamation
AMD
basics
watershed
basics
water
monitoring
organizations
& agencies
finding
help
out of
the box
picture
gallery
Scarlift
reports
AMD
treatment
organizing
partnerships
assessment & restoration laws &
policies
environmental
education
abandoned
mine posts

Out of the Box

Novel Solutions

home

Computerized FGM Design and Construction for Land Reclamation

This one's a peak into the future.  Yet it's being done now.  Traditional land reclamation for abandoned mine lands sites is based on returning the disturbed land to it's  "approximate original contour" (AOC).  While it sort of looks like the land as it was before mining, it usually has an engineered look that you can spot like a bad toupee.  And like a bad toupee, this kind of reclamation doesn't behave like the real thing either.   The original landscape had to be shaped over a long period of time to shed water and hold vegetation without degradation.  The engineered designs don't include the richness and subtlety in contour needed to behave in a way that sustains itself over the long haul.  Until recently, AOC is about as good as could be done.  That's all changing.

Based in concepts of fluvial geomorphology, practitioners are now able to design landscapes that look and act like the real deal.  And get this...  if you have the right tools, it's a lot cheaper and easier to do it the better way!  Yes, it takes some high-tech, wiz-bang tools and the mastery of them, but beyond that there appears to be little downside.  Not only is design made easier via this process, but the actual construction phase can be automated using GPS technology.

The following side-by-side comparison was taken directly from Carlson Software website on its "Natural Regrade" software

Old method   Natural Regrade
software with GeoFluvT
 
   
Based on conveying a single extreme discharge event
Conveys only water discharge effectively at lower Q
Requires expensive off-site earth material, e.g., rip-rap
Expensive on steep slopes
Requires long-term maintenance
Requires maximum backfill to lower slopes
Provides minimal slope aspect diversity
Visual affront
Rigid design sideboards limit landscape alternatives
Regulatory agencies not satisfied
 
   
Based on all discharges
Natural channel morphology conveys water and sediment discharge; hydrologic balance
Built with on-site materials
Cost is significantly lower than gradient terraces and down drains on steep slopes
Self-maintaining
Can reclaim steep slopes in stable and suitable configurations, save money on material moving
Increased slope aspect diversity promotes vegetation success and animal habitat
Natural beauty
Landscape designs can vary and provide alternatives
Regulatory agencies embrace, GeoFluvT approach is award-winning

 

 

Carlson Software - Land Development Engineering Resources

OSM "Best of Best" Award